Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Two Jokes Are Worse Than One

The teaser of "Bogie Nights", a first-season episode of Strangers With Candy, features Jerri Blank planting a ficus for "St. Arbor's Day". The camera angle widens to reveal that she has planted the tree on the pitcher's mound of the school baseball diamond. In the episode's tag, we return to the tree. The holiday now being over, Jerri hacks the tree down with an ax.


The joke in the teaser is humorous. The one in the tag falls flat. And it's because we're getting two jokes at once. The joke is that Jerri thinks she is doing something good for Arbor Day, but her efforts are a failure (Audience: "That's not where you plant a tree!"). OR the joke is that Jerri is doing something good for Arbor Day, but then she takes it back once the holiday is over (Audience: "But you're supposed to let the tree grow!"). But the joke is not both of these.

A joke can't be funny for two reasons. It just can't. The trick to a good joke is that it's simple. Expectation, then subversion. If a joke has two punchlines, the result is confusion. And while a confused character can be funny, a confused audience is no laughing matter.

Compare to this type of scene: As two characters have a conversation in the foreground, something wild and unexpected is happening behind them. The joke is that the characters don't notice the crazy antics in the background. But if the dialogue in the foreground is also supposed to be funny, then nothing in the scene gets a laugh. The jokes choke each other out.

This is an old rule of comedy, but I just realized that Aeschylus uses it to his advantage in Agamemnon, of all things. Queen Clytemnestra speaks to the chorus after she (spoiler alert) kills Agamemnon. She gives a lot of good excuses for why she did it. She did it because Agamemnon killed their daughter, Iphigenia. She did it because Agamemnon brought a concubine home from the war. She did it because of the curse on the House of Atreus.

Just as a joke can only be funny for one reason, you can only kill someone for one reason. But the error here is Clytemnestra's, not Aeschylus's. If Clytemnestra had protested with any one of these excuses, the audience might sympathize with her. But the combination of reasons results in no reason at all. She seems unreliable and the audience doesn't trust her, just as Aeschylus intends it.

Be on the look-out for when one-plus-one equals zero.

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Sort of Off-Topic, But Also Sort of Not

I was thinking about an icky narrative convention seen in many works of fiction where a female character is punished for having sex. This is very common in horror movies (as we learned in Scream, "virgins never die"). But sadly it shows up in much sneakier ways all over the place. Watch for it - a woman who has sex outside of marriage is almost always headed for a downfall.

And so this got me thinking about things like abortion and rape. That's right. This post is about women's rights. Continue at your own risk.

I don't think the abortion debate is really about women's rights. I think it's about fetus rights. And I can respect either side of the argument. If you're pro-life, you believe a fetus has rights of some kind. If you're pro-choice, you don't believe a fetus has any rights. (Because surely life is the most basic right we can grant.) Although I have my own beliefs, I can respect either of these two viewpoints as valid.

What I cannot respect is the belief that there is some sort of moral grey area surrounding pregnancies that are a product of rape. If you believe that abortions should only be allowed for rape victims, you have some pretty screwed up ideas about pregnancy.

Here's my attempt at objectively summarizing this point of view: A pregnant woman has already made her choice, and should now have to deal with the consequences. An exception can be made for rape victims, because that choice was taken from them.

And not so objectively: Pregnancy is a punishment for doing something wrong. Women are punished for having sex by being forced to bear children. But rape victims didn't do it on purpose, so they can have abortions.

People with this belief are not anti-abortion because they believe in the rights of the fetus. They are anti-abortion because, if women are allowed to terminate pregnancies, how will they be punished for having sex?

The widespread popularity of this belief means our young female who is murdered after losing her virginity is sort of art-imitating-life.


Just like pregnancy, this guy makes sure
lusty young gals get what's coming to them.